Wednesday, July 19, 2017

NYT and DJT

July 19, 2017 the New York Times interviewed Donald J. Trump, also known as POTUS.  The following are excerpts and observations.

TRUMP: Look, [Attorney General Jeff] Sessions gets the job. Right after he gets the job, he recuses himself.

TRUMP: Well, Sessions should have never recused himself, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job, and I would have picked somebody else.
TRUMP: Zero. So Jeff Sessions takes the job, gets into the job, recuses himself. I then have — which, frankly, I think is very unfair to the president. How do you take a job and then recuse yourself? If he would have recused himself before the job, I would have said, “Thanks, Jeff, but I can’t, you know, I’m not going to take you.” It’s extremely unfair, and that’s a mild word, to the president. So he recuses himself. I then end up with a second man, who’s a deputy.
   
TRUMP: Who is he? And Jeff hardly knew. He’s from Baltimore.

TRUMP: Yeah, what Jeff Sessions did was he recused himself right after, right after he became attorney general. And I said, “Why didn’t you tell me this before?” I would have — then I said, “Who’s your deputy?” So his deputy he hardly knew, and that’s Rosenstein, Rod Rosenstein, who is from Baltimore. There are very few Republicans in Baltimore, if any. So, he’s from Baltimore. Now, he, we went through a lot of things. We were interviewing replacements at the F.B.I. Did you know [Robert] Mueller was one of the people that was being interviewed?

So, just a few questions.  Would you have preferred Sessions continue as Attorney General and investigate any Russian  connection to your campaign after it was determined he had lied to the Senate at confirmation hearings?  Until he was caught, he had not intended to recuse himself.  Sessions was confirmed on February 8, 2017 and recused himself from any Russian investigation on March 2, 2017.  So, the "right after he gets the job" statement is at best, misleading.  Had you vetted him properly this would not have been an issue.  Or, were you aware of his contact with Russians and expected him engage in in what WOULD have been a conflict of interest?

What's really amusing are Trump's comments about Rosenstein.  President Donald Trump nominated Rosenstein to serve as Deputy Attorney General for the United States Department of Justice on January 13, 2017.  Why would he have to ask “Who’s your deputy?”  Furthermore, Rosenstein is not from Maryland, he is from Philadelphia.  He has lived and worked in Maryland since 2005 when he was nominated as U.S. Attorney General by George W. Bush.  Oh, and he is a Republican.

TRUMP: So the bottom line is this. The country’s doing well. We are, we are moving forward with a lot of great things. The unemployment is the lowest it’s been in 16 years. The stock market is the highest it’s ever been. It’s up almost 20 percent since I took office. And we’re working hard on health care. Um, the Russian investigation — it’s not an investigation, it’s not on me — you know, they’re looking at a lot of things.

Congratulations on the unemployment figures.. You hold the office of the President so you get the credit.  However, with regard to the stock market, your figures are patently false.  According to www.dow-jones-djia.com the market is up 9.17% for the year.  I consider there figures to be authoritative.  Not to be disingenuous I ran the numbers from the date of your swearing in and stocks are up 9.61% so you are ahead of the year-to-date but not even 1/2 way to 20%.  You say working hard on health care.  I see failing to provide accessible and affordable health care options.

In  his first description of his dinnertime conversation with Mr. Putin at the Group of 20 summit meeting in Hamburg, Germany, Mr. Trump downplayed its significance. He said his wife, Melania, was seated next to Mr.Putin at the other end of a table filled with world leaders.
“The meal was going toward dessert,’’ he said. “I went down just to say hello to Melania, and while I was there I said hello to Putin. Really, pleasantries more than anything else. It was not a long conversation, but it was, you know, could be 15 minutes. Just talked about things. Actually, it was very interesting, we talked about adoption.”

I added this just for an example of how to confound a listener.  He said hello apparently just coincidentally, mainly just pleasantries, a short conversation.  Wait, maybe we did talk about things, for 15 minutes, actually it was very interesting.  We talked about adoption.  Dude, pardon my French, but, WTF?

I read the entire interview multiple times.  It was painful.  I strongly recommend you do the same.

Whaduyathink?


Sunday, July 9, 2017

What's missing?

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Meeting with Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany
Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Meeting with President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico
Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Meeting with President Joko Widodo of Indonesia
Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Meeting with Prime Minister Theresa May of the United Kingdom
Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Meeting with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan
Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Meeting with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore
Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Meeting with President Xi Jinping of China

It seems there is a readout of at least 1 other meeting not displayed.  Can you identify it?
Whatduyathink?

Saturday, July 8, 2017

Blather


I am accidentally more coherent than POTUS is with assistance.  What was the purpose of these speeches?  Even I can comprehend that the purpose of international travel for a head of state is to promote mutual cooperation, not to market.  The United States of America is a country, not a corporation.  The existence of a nation state actually requires some statesmanship.  If you want to claim the title of world leader you must speak to the world, not just your clique.  Excerpts from the speeches are in black text, comments are in red.  

Remarks by President Trump at the Three Seas Initiative Summit | July 6, 2017

Royal Castle

Warsaw, Poland



The Three Seas Initiative is a joint Polish-Croatian project, launched in 2016, with the aim of strengthening trade, infrastructure, energy and political co-operation among countries bordering the Adriatic, the Baltic and the Black Sea.

- The following 12 countries are part of the initiative:

Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Croatia, Slovenia and Austria.

- Most of the 12 countries were in the Soviet sphere of influence after World War Two until 1989 and more than half of those joined the European Union in 2004. Nearly all are heavily reliant on Russian gas and oil imports.



New energy infrastructure is essential to this rebuilding effort.  We hope that the Three Seas nations will advance the same goals we are working on to achieve for our people in America.  We’re doing tremendously well.  Our stock market just hit an all-time high.  As it continues just like the past 9 years.  We have, I think, 16 years -- in 16 years it’s the lowest unemployment rate.  Our military is getting stronger and stronger.  We’re rebuilding it, adding billions and billions of dollars of new equipment.  The best equipment in the world.  We make the best equipment in the world by far.  We’re adding many billions of dollars of brand-new equipment.  

“This is why some people don’t want peace: they make more money from war, although wars make money but lose lives, health, education. The devil enters through our wallets.”  Pope Francis

And the United States is doing very well -- very strong.  We’ve taken off restrictions and people are really moving hard.  So when I say that the stock market is at an all-time high, we’ve picked up in market value almost $4 trillion since November 8th, which was the election.  $4 trillion -- it's a lot of money.  Personally, I picked up nothing, but that’s all right. This might be true had you divested yourself of commercial property using a blind trust.  That is not the case. Everyone else is getting rich.  That's awesome, therefore everyone will have access to and be able to afford adequate health care. That’s okay.  I’m very happy.  

I congratulate your nations for already beginning the critical projects that open us up to greater access, and you’ll be totally open and have access to energy markets and remove barriers to energy trade, such as floating LNG terminal on the Croatian island of Krk.  Did you ever hear of that?  Right?  Huh?  You know all about that.  I bet you know all about it. You are addressing a conference of industrialists.  Why do you speak to people as if they are 8th graders?  And the Greece-Bulgaria Interconnector.  

These projects and many others are crucial to ensuring that your nations continue to diversify your energy sources, suppliers, and routes.  I also applaud Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, and Austria for pursuing a pipeline from the Black Sea.  We just approved a big pipeline also -- the Keystone Pipeline.  It was under consideration for many, many years, and it was dead and I approved it in my first day of office.  Actually, it was approved in March 2017, but let's not muddy the waters with facts.  And it’s now under construction.  And another pipeline besides that -- big ones -- Dakota Access.  



America will be a faithful and dependable partner in the export and sale of our high-quality and low-cost energy resources and technologies.  We make the best technology and we make the best, best technology for fighter jets and ships and equipment, military weapons.  There’s nobody even close, and that’s acknowledged.  There is no disputing this and it's a good thing.  Not only do we offer the best war making machines in the world but we have the largest economy.  We spend more on our military than the next 10 largest spending countries combined.  This may explain why the U.S. ranks anywhere from 7th-25th in education and 27th-37th in health care, world wide, depending on the rating system you prefer. All over the world they talk about the greatness of our military equipment.  Nobody comes close.  So when you buy and as you buy military equipment, hopefully you’ll be thinking only of the United States.



This summit ushers in the next great energy frontier.  This is largely about energy because we are that great exporter.  We’ve just become -- what’s going on in our country is incredible, and I hope you take advantage of it by using these resources.  Oh, right, this was a conference about energy infrastructure.  I was distracted by the references to U.S. capital creation and war making capabilities. 



July 06, 2017

Remarks by President Trump to the People of Poland | July 6, 2017

Krasiński Square

Warsaw, Poland

We've come to your nation to deliver a very important message:  America loves Poland, and America loves the Polish people.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  



We are also pleased that former President Leck Walesa, so famous for leading the Solidarity Movement, has joined us today, also.  Well done, recognizing a trade union organizer and human rights activist.  



Thank you.  Thank you so much.  Thank you.  Thank you so much.  Such a great honor.  This is a nation more than one thousand years old.  Your borders were erased for more than a century and only restored just one century ago. 

In 1920, in the Miracle of Vistula, Poland stopped the Soviet army bent on European conquest.  (Applause.)  Then, 19 years later in 1939, you were invaded yet again, this time by Nazi Germany from the west and the Soviet Union from the east.  That’s trouble.  That’s tough.  Poignant.  

Under a double occupation the Polish people endured evils beyond description: the Katyn forest massacre, the occupations, the Holocaust, the Warsaw Ghetto and the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, the destruction of this beautiful capital city, and the deaths of nearly one in five Polish people.  A vibrant Jewish population -- the largest in Europe -- was reduced to almost nothing after the Nazis systematically murdered millions of Poland’s Jewish citizens, along with countless others, during that brutal occupation.  No doubt the Poles attending need this history lesson.



But just as our adversaries and enemies of the past learned here in Poland, we know that these forces, too, are doomed to fail if we want them to fail.



Our adversaries, however, are doomed because we will never forget who we are.  And if we don’t forget who are, we just can't be beaten.  Americans will never forget.  The nations of Europe will never forget.  We are the fastest and the greatest community.  There is nothing like our community of nations.  The world has never known anything like our community of nations.  Of whom is this community comprised? Are you proposing the countries which do not constitute the "western" world will be beaten and fail?  Does the possession of different customs and values make one an enemy or adversary merely by existing?  See @realDonaldTrump tweet at bottom.



We empower women as pillars of our society and of our success.  

He insulted Brande Roderick, a contestant on The Apprentice. "It must be a pretty picture," he said to her. "You dropping to your knees."  

He fat-shamed former Miss Universe Alicia Machado. 

he has called "Miss Piggy," "Miss Housekeeping," and an "eating machine." 

"I heard poorly rated @Morning_Joe speaks badly of me (don't watch anymore). Then how come low I.Q. Crazy Mika, along with Psycho Joe, came ... to Mar-a-Lago 3 nights in a row around New Year's Eve, and insisted on joining me. She was bleeding badly from a face-lift. I said no!"

He called opposing counsel in a deposition “disgusting” for wanting to break to pump milk for her 3-month-old daughter. 

  • “You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.” 
  • And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."



We put faith and family, not government and bureaucracy, at the center of our lives. No doubt that is why POTUS has been married 3 times.   And we debate everything.  We challenge everything.  We seek to know everything so that we can better know ourselves.



And above all, we value the dignity of every human life, protect the rights of every person, and share the hope of every soul to live in freedom.  As exemplified by insuring every citizen has access to quality health care. 



 Americans know that a strong alliance of free, sovereign and independent nations is the best defense for our freedoms and for our interests.  That is why my administration has demanded that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligation.  

As a result of this insistence, billions of dollars more have begun to pour into NATO.  In fact, people are shocked.  But billions and billions of dollars more are coming in from countries that, in my opinion, would not have been paying so quickly.  POTUS has made this claim repeatedly with a lack of regard for the facts.

NATO was established in the aftermath of World War II, originally with 12 members and the intention of binding together Western Europe in a defense alliance with the United States and Canada to counter the Soviet Union and its satellite countries in Eastern Europe (known as the Warsaw Pact). After the Soviet Union collapsed and the Warsaw Pact unraveled, NATO expanded to include many Eastern European nations and even former parts of the Soviet Union. There are now 28 member countries in NATO. 

There are two types of funding for NATO: direct funding and indirect funding. Direct funding, for military-related operations, maintenance and headquarters activity, is based on gross national income — the total domestic and foreign output claimed by residents of a country — and adjusted regularly. With the largest economy in NATO, the United States pays the largest share — about 22 percent. Germany is second, with about 15 percent. A significant portion of the U.S. share is operating the Airborne Early Warning and Control System (AWACS) fleet operations, according to the Congressional Research Service.

The U.S. share of the actual military budget is negotiated each year, but largely based on the cost-sharing formula, and amounts to less than $500 million a year, according to Defense Department documents.

That’s a rounding error in a $600 billion defense budget.

But Trump is really talking about indirect funding. Since 2006, each NATO member has had a guideline of spending at least 2 percent of gross domestic product on defense spending. At a 2014 summit, responding to Russian aggression in Ukraine, NATO members pledged to meet that guideline by 2024. 



At the moment, only five of the 28 members exceed the guideline — with the United States leading the way at 3.6 percent. The other members that exceed the guideline are Greece, Estonia, Britain and Poland, but the perceived threat from Russia has prompted other nations to bolster their defense spending. In 2016, median spending by NATO members on defense was 1.21 percent of GDP, but it’s still eight years away from the deadline. The guideline is not legally binding.

Moreover, as defense experts Richard Sokolsy and Gordon Adams have noted, the 2 percent guideline is rather arbitrary. Greece met it, even though it has slashed defense spending, because its economy collapsed. “Measuring what the allies spend on defense as a share of their economies tells us nothing about the capabilities they are buying,” they wrote for the War on the Rocks website.

Yet Trump continues to misleadingly frame the failure to meet the guideline as money owed to the United States: “This is not fair to the people and taxpayers of the United States. And many of these nations owe massive amounts of money from past years and not paying in those past years,” he said at NATO, as cameras recorded puzzled or skeptical expressions on the faces of other leaders. 



But this is simply money that each country would spend on its own military — or on missions that do not include NATO, such as peacekeeping in Africa. Trump noted that if all NATO members met the 2 percent guideline, then another $119 billion would be spent on defense. But this would still leave the rest of NATO far behind the United States alone — $608 billion for the United States, $400 billion for the other 27 members. (Trump, in fact, proposes to boost U.S. military spending even more.)

“We have to remember that fair burden-sharing was something we addressed at our summit in 2014,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg told reporters after Trump’s speech. “And several NATO allies also expressed that we have to invest in defense not just to please the United States but we have to invest in European defense because it is in our own interest to do so.”

While Stoltenberg said Trump has been “very clear, blunt and plain” at the NATO meetings, he reminded reporters that NATO had already taken action before Trump arrived on the scene: “After years of decline in defense spending across Europe and Canada we turned the corner in 2015, we stopped the cuts, and in 2016 we had significant increase.” 



Why does the United States spend so much more on its defense? The United States is a world power with global responsibilities, including in Asia. Iceland, which spends the smallest percent of its GDP on defense, does not even have a standing army, though it has a coast guard.

Experts say it’s impossible to figure out how much of U.S. military spending is devoted just to NATO but for decades, U.S. presidents have concluded that the U.S. commitment to the defense of NATO members was an essential part of overall U.S. security. U.S. bases in Germany, for instance, are frequently an important part of American operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. (The United States spends about $7 billion a year on bases in Germany, South Korea and Japan, about half of which is paid back.)



That is why we applaud Poland for its decision to move forward this week on acquiring from the United States the battle-tested Patriot air and missile defense system -- the best anywhere in the world.  (Applause.)  That is also why we salute the Polish people for being one of the NATO countries that has actually achieved the benchmark for investment in our common defense.  Good job on making the sale.  However, Russia invading Poland is a far cry from Iraq firing missiles at Israel where the Patriot air and missile defense system was used in combat.  Even then, and you can look this up, the results were less than stellar.






THE WEST WILL NEVER BE BROKEN. Our values will PREVAIL. Our people will THRIVE and our civilization will TRIUMPH!
Whaduyathink?  Feel free to comment, share, follow.

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Travel Warnings

Travel warnings...
MAGA! Do you feel safer?

Thru January 19, 2017
   
Kenya Travel Warning
Somalia Travel Warning
Bangladesh Travel Warning
Republic of South Sudan Travel Warning
Egypt Travel Warning
Jordan Travel Warning
Philippines Travel Warning
Venezuela Travel Warning
Mexico Travel Warning
Iran Travel Warning

Here's what's been added since then;

Mali Travel Warning
Ukraine Travel Warning
Burundi Travel Warning
Algeria Travel Warning
Colombia Travel Warning
Iraq Travel Warning
Ethiopia Travel Warning
Burkina Faso Travel Warning
Chad Travel Warning
Hurricane and Typhoon Season 2017 Travel Alert
Central African Republic Travel Warning
Haiti Travel Warning
Pakistan Travel Warning
Yemen Travel Warning
North Korea Travel Warning
Tunisia Travel Warning
Travel Alert Europe
Israel, The West Bank and Gaza Travel Warning
Niger Travel Warning
Kenya Travel Alert
Nigeria Travel Warning
Sudan Travel Warning
Democratic Republic of the Congo Travel Warning
Saudi Arabia Travel Warning
Turkey Travel Warning
Mauritania Travel Warning
Cameroon Travel Warning
Syria Travel Warning
Afghanistan Travel Warning
Eritrea Travel Warning
Lebanon Travel Warning
El Salvador Travel Warning
Libya Travel Warning
Honduras Travel Warning

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Greatest Accomplishments EVER! Believe me.


Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump Jun 23 
I've helped pass and signed 38 Legislative Bills, mostly with no Democratic support, and gotten rid of massive amounts of regulations. Nice!

Not exactly, with minimal effort you can actually see how many Republicans and Democrats voted for each bill.  Why would someone make a statement that can be quickly and easily shown to be blatantly false?

Mainstream (FAKE) media refuses to state our long list of achievements, including 28 legislative signings, strong borders & great optimism!  Previous tweet.

The first bill was to make an exception for a Trump appointee.  3 of these pieces of legislative are to name buildings.  3 bills providing for the reappointment of 3 individuals as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.  1 was a memorial declaration.  Another few relieving corporations of rules which required them to either protect the environment or be subject to cost and/or documentation scrutiny.  

If you want to be recognized, do something worthy of recognition.  After having reviewed all of these legislative signings I am of the opinion POTUS has spent more time on Twitter and the golf course than he has on these bills. 

Here are those legislative signings. 

S.84  Bill to provide exception for James N. "Mad Dog" Mattis to be appointed as Secretary of Defense since the rules don't apply to this administration.

H.R.72 - GAO Access and Oversight Act of 2017; To ensure the Government Accountability Office has adequate access to information.
I certainly hope so.

H.J.Res.41 - Providing for congressional disapproval and nullification of "Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers" rule finalized by the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 27, 2016. (The rule, mandated under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, requires resource extraction issuers to disclose payments made to governments for the commercial development of oil, natural gas, or minerals.  Because, let's face it, it's really none of the business of citizens who is paying whom and for what in our government.

H.J.Res.38 - Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known as the Stream Protection Rule. 

The Stream Protection Rule covers waterways near surface coal mining operations like mountaintop-removal mines.  Because, really, who wouldn't trust a commercial coal mining operation to preserve local waterways?

H.J.Res. 40 - Joint Resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Social Security Administration relating to Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007.  Don't you want to make is easier for individuals who are disqualified from the purchase of firearms to more effectively circumvent the system in order to purchase firearms?

H.R. 255 - Promoting Women in Entrepreneurship Act.  
To authorize the National Science Foundation to support entrepreneurial programs for women. 

Section 33 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (42 U.S.C. 1885a) is amended—

(1) by striking “and” at the end of paragraph (10);

(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (11) and inserting “; and”; and

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(12) encourage its entrepreneurial programs to recruit and support women to extend their focus beyond the laboratory and into the commercial world.”.  Here's a major legislative accomplishment.

H.R. 321 - Inspiring the Next Space Pioneers, Innovators, Researchers, and Explorers (INSPIRE) Women Act. Promoting a study.

H.R.609 - To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs health care center in Center Township, Butler County, Pennsylvania, as the "Abie Abraham VA Clinic".  Self explanatory in it's national significance.

S.442 - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2017. 

Congress hadn’t passed a NASA funding authorization bill in seven years.  While its most newsworthy provision is the aforementioned money to send humans to Mars, the $19.5 billion authorization contains a number of other provisions sure to excite science lovers. They include:Reaffirming a January decision by the Obama administration to continue American involvement with the International Space Station through 2024.

  • Guaranteeing free lifetime health care for astronauts.
  • Resurrecting the National Space Council, a governmental body that hasn’t existed since 1993,

Who opposed it, astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson called the bill a “wolf in sheep’s clothes”

“My read of the (entire) plan is to remove Earth monitoring from NASA’s mission statement, leaving NASA to think only about the rest of the Universe and not Earth as a part of that same universe,” Tyson wrote. “Unless this task is picked up by some other agency, the disconnect will be disastrous to our understanding of our own planet, preventing us from knowing and predicting our own impact on our own environment.”  Well, let's just hope we can terra form Mars before Earth becomes uninhabitable by humans.

H.J. Res. 37 - Joint Resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulation.  No one could possibly want Federal contractors to be required to disclose compliance information with 14 federal labor laws and state equivalents to the government. Agency contracting officers are then required to take these disclosures into consideration when awarding contracts.
Second, the rule imposes requirements for “paycheck transparency”. Contractors required to maintain wage records under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Service Contract Act, or substantially similar state laws, must provide documentation of “hours worked, overtime hours, pay, and additions to or deductions from pay” in each pay period.
Third, the rule limits the mandatory arbitration of employee claims by requiring government contracts and subcontracts valued over $1 million to incorporate clauses stating that employees must voluntarily consent to arbitration of these claims.

H.J. Res. 44 - Joint Resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land.  By all means, let's get rid of a rule that affirms the important role of other Federal agencies, State and local governments, Indian tribes, and the public during the planning process and enhances opportunities for public involvement and transparency during the preparation of resource management plans. The final rule will enable the BLM to more readily address resource issues at a variety of scales, such as wildfire, wildlife habitat, appropriate development, or the demand for renewable and non-renewable energy sources, and to respond more effectively to change. The final rule emphasizes the role of using high quality information, including the best available scientific information, in the planning process; and the importance of evaluating the resource, environmental, ecological, social, and economic conditions at the onset of planning. There can't possibly be any reason to involve all those non-executive branch bodies in any land management.  Especially not the people who live there.

H.J.Res.57 - Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to accountability and State plans under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.  It should be apparent there is no need for accountability when the most recent PISA results, from 2015, placed the U.S. an unimpressive 38th out of 71 countries in math and 24th in science.  All good here.
S. 305 - Vietnam War Veterans Recognition Act of 2017.  SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF FLAG ON NATIONAL VIETNAM WAR VETERANS DAY.  Honorable, but does this count as a significant legislative achievement?
H.J.Res.42 - Joint Resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to drug testing of unemployment compensation applicants.  Individuals don't need any protection from corporate America or governing bodies.
H.R.1362 - An Act to name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Pago Pago, American Samoa, the Faleomavaega Eni Fa'aua'a Hunkin VA Clinic.  Big, possibly the biggest renaming ever.
S.J.Res.1 - Joint Resolution approving the location of a memorial to commemorate and honor the members of the Armed Forces who served on active duty in support of Operation Desert Storm or Operation Desert Shield.  It is certainly difficult to comprehend how major media outlets could have failed to recognize and praise this major piece of legislature.
H.J.Res.69 Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska.  No need to manage the harvesting of predators, especially on National Wildlife Refuges. 
H.J.Res. 83, which nullifies the Department of Labor's rule titled Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness.  This can't help but MAGA.  I feel safer and more productive just reading it.
S.J.Res. 34 - Joint Resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband.  I love this one.  I'm anticipating with great glee viewing the search histories of ALL my legislators.
H.R. 1228, S.J.Res. 30, S.J.Res. 35 S.J. Res. 36 are all exclusively administrative tasks 
H.J.Res.43, apparently the more you can restrict access to family planning the better.
H.J.Res. 67 - Joint Resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by qualified State political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.  Let's be honest, if you can't help the 1%, why bother?
H.R.353 - Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017, fortunately NOAA will not be burdened with any study, research, or concern regarding climate change.

S. 544 - An Act to amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 to modify the termination date for the Veterans Choice Program, and for other purposes. SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF TERMINATION DATE FOR VETERANS CHOICE PROGRAM.
Section 101(p)(2) of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ‘‘, or the date that is 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, whichever occurs first’’.  Yea.

S.J.Res. 30 - Joint Resolution providing for the reappointment of Steve Case as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

This is big, bigly, the biggest.

S.J.Res. 35 - Joint Resolution providing for the appointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
Another biggie?

S.J.Res. 36 - Joint Resolution providing for the appointment of Roger W. Ferguson as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
Biggest yet?

H.J.Res. 99 - Joint Resolution making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2017, and for other purposes.
This was actually purposeful.

H.R. 244 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017
That the House agree to the amendments numbered 2 and 3 of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 244) entitled “An Act to encourage effective, voluntary investments to recruit, employ, and retain men and women who have served in the United States military with annual Federal awards to employers recognizing such efforts, and for other purposes.”,
Read this act, you're not gonna believe it.

H.R. 534 - U.S. Wants to Compete for a World Expo Act
Yeehaw!!

S. 496 -An Act to repeal the rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration entitled “Metropolitan Planning Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform”.
Cuz', really, planning and coordination are way overrated.  

H.R. 274 - Modernizing Government Travel Act.
Don't worry, the money to fund this can come from the savings in Medicaid and other health care and social programs.

H.J.Res. 66 - Joint Resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to savings arrangements established by States for non-governmental employees.
Who wants to encourage savings when consumption is what the economy needs?

S. 419 - Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2017
Good bill, actually.


S. 583 - American Law Enforcement Heroes Act of 2017
Nice touch

H.R. 366 - DHS Stop Asset and Vehicle Excess Act or the DHS SAVE Act
Managing the motor pool

H.R. 375 - An Act to designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 719 Church Street in Nashville, Tennessee, as the “Fred D. Thompson Federal Building and United States Courthouse”.
Speaks for itself

H.R. 657 - Follow the Rules Act
Does this need legislation?

S. 1094 - Department of Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act of 2017
It's a start.


Friday, June 23, 2017

Better stay Healthy

Obamacare (ACA) is dead according to the current administration.  Whereas with the current plan, ACA, insurance companies have withdrawn from markets in order to protect and increase profit, fortunately there is relief in sight.  Relief for corporate profits and CEO's, not for those who are sick and dieing.

Surely you jest, I hear.  I am aware the vast majority of my fellows derive their information regarding the American Health Care Act (AHCA) from sources other than the actual bill.  I note it is especially prevalent to obtain information from sources which support one's preconceptions.

Please, allow me to share what H.R. 1628, the American Health Care Act of 2017 actually says.
First:  "Subtitle B--Medicaid Program Enhancement ".  When I use the term enhance I generally mean to intensify or increase in quality, value, power, etc; improve; augment.  Here is how the term is used in the ACHA.  "(Sec. 111) The bill amends title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act (SSAct) to limit the state option for a participating-provider hospital to preliminarily determine an individual's Medicaid eligibility for purposes of providing the individual with medical assistance during a presumptive eligibility period. The bill lowers, from 133% to 100% of the official poverty line, the minimum family-income threshold that a state may use to determine the Medicaid eligibility of children between the ages of 6 and 19. In addition, the bill reduces the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) for Medicaid home- and community-based attendant services and supports. "  

Let's flesh that out.  For a single person the federal poverty line is $12,060, for a party of 4 it is $24,600.  Currently, Medicaid eligibility is determined to be a threshold income of 133% of the poverty line, $16.039.80 and $32,718 respectively.  The new threshold for Medicaid eligibility will be 100% of the poverty line.  That act will result in at least a few people losing access to medical care.  Of course, a culling of the herd is occasionally necessary.

"Under current law, any alternative benefit plan offered by a state Medicaid program is required to provide specified essential health benefits. The bill eliminates this requirement beginning in 2020. ("Essential health benefits" include ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, prescription drugs, rehabilitative services, laboratory services, preventative and wellness services, and pediatric services.) "

One would think that services identified as essential would be required.  Let us not be so hasty.   ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, prescription drugs, rehabilitative services, laboratory services, preventative and wellness services, and pediatric services, all "essential" will not be required to be provided.  I am confident that plans which don't provide these essential services will have substantially reduced premiums.  It seems, though, if you don't require any of the services mentioned, you really have no need for medical insurance.

"In addition, the bill eliminates the requirement for up to three months of retroactive coverage under Medicaid. Under current law, a state Medicaid program must provide coverage for up to three months prior to an individual's application for benefits if the individual would have been eligible for benefits during that period."

'Cause let's face it, poor sick people are just a burden.

"Subtitle C--Per Capita Allotment for Medical Assistance
(Sec. 121) Under current law, state Medicaid programs are guaranteed federal matching funds for qualifying expenditures. The bill establishes limits on federal funding for state Medicaid programs beginning in FY2020. Specifically, the bill establishes targeted spending caps for each state, using a formula based on the state's FY2016 medical assistance expenditures in each enrollee category: (1) the elderly, (2) the blind and disabled, (3) children, (4) adults made newly eligible for Medicaid by PPACA, and (5) all other enrollees. With respect to a state that exceeds its targeted spending cap in a given fiscal year, the bill provides for reduced federal funding in the following fiscal year. In addition, the bill: (1) requires additional reporting and auditing of state data on medical assistance expenditures, and (2) temporarily increases the FMAP with respect to certain data reporting expenditures."

Just to clarify, if my state determines to provide care for the elderly, blind and disabled, children, et al., and exceeds a federally mandated maximum, not only will that excess amount not be matched by federal funds (fair enough) but the next year my state will be penalized with a reduction in federal funding.  However, the administrative portion of the program will receive an increase in funding to ensure control of fraud and waste.

"(Sec. 133) Health insurers must increase premiums by 30% for one year for enrollees in the individual market who had a break in coverage of more than 62 days in the previous year. States with programs under this bill to provide financial assistance to high-risk individuals or stabilize health insurance premiums in the individual market and states participating in the Federal Invisible Risk Sharing Program may apply for a waiver to allow health insurers, for individuals with a break in coverage, to vary premiums based on an individual's health status instead of increasing premiums by 30%."

Let's all say "cha-ching".  Well, maybe not all of us, especially those subject to a 30% premium increase.  One of the largest complaints regarding the ACA is premium increases.  Now, we have insurance companies not only allowed but required to increase premiums.  How would you describe this?  How about usurious, unconscionable, greedy?

"
(Sec. 134) Beginning in 2020, health insurance benefits no longer must conform to actuarial tiers (e.g., silver level benefits).
(Sec. 135) The bill increases the ratio by which health insurance premiums may vary by age, from a three to one ratio to a five to one ratio. This ratio may be preempted by states.
(Sec. 136) States may apply to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for waivers to increase the ratio by which health insurance premiums may vary by age and to waive the requirement for insurance to cover the essential health benefits.
These waivers and the waiver to allow premiums to vary by health status do not apply to health plans offered through the CO-OP program, multi-state plans, plans the federal government makes available to members of Congress and their staff, or plans under PPACA provisions that allow state flexibility. "

Just to make clear, as an insurance provider I am no only constrained to a 3:1 variance in my premiums levied but can now exercise a 5:1 variance.  You have to admire the success of the insurance lobby.  They did fail to make this applicable to plans made available to members of Congress and their staff.

"(Sec. 204) This section repeals the penalties for individuals who are not covered by a health plan that provides at least minimum essential coverage (commonly referred to as the individual mandate). The repeal is effective for months beginning after December 31, 2015"

Who needs penalties when you have mandatory 30% premium increases?

"(Sec. 213) This section repeals the additional Medicare tax that is imposed on certain employees and self-employed individuals with wages or self-employment income above specified thresholds."

Yeah, 'cuz that 0.9% surcharge on wages over $200,000 was a burdensome tax.

"Subtitle B--Repeal of Certain Consumer Taxes
(Sec. 221) This section repeals the annual fee on branded prescription pharmaceutical manufacturers and importers.
(Sec. 222) This section repeals the annual fee imposed on certain health insurance providers based on market share."

These were consumer taxes only in the sense the cost was no doubt added to the product I purchased.  By that reasoning, I should recognize a reduction in cost assuming this bill becomes law.  How quickly do you think this will be noticeable?

"Subtitle D--Remuneration From Certain Insurers
(Sec. 241) The section repeals a provision that prohibits certain health insurance providers from deducting remuneration paid to an officer, director, or employee in excess of $500,000. "

Please, someone explain to me how this will have a positive affect on my access to and ability to afford health care.

That concludes my summary of the AHCA.  However, as a bonus, here's some comment from the Congressional Budget Office.  CBO and JCT estimate that enacting the American Health Care Act would reduce federal deficits by $119 billion over the coming decade and increase the number of people who are uninsured by 23 million in 2026 relative to current law. 03/23/2017
As posted on the website of the House Committee on Rules on March 22, 2017, incorporating manager’s amendments 4, 5, 24, and 25.

No doubt reducing the deficit by any amount is a good thing.  It's just an added benefit when you can do it on the backs of the sick, poor, uneducated, weak, disabled, young, elderly and disenfranchised.  Surely we can find more than 23,000,000 million of them.

Whaduyathink?





The Defeat of ISIS

For more than 2 years, Donald Trump, as a candidate, President-elect and President, has held forth on defeating ISIS.  He advocates an extensive air campaign, the annihilation of ISIS, including the killing of the families of ISIS members, and states he is better informed with regard to ISIS than his Generals.  I will make some comments that are based solely on the direct quotes of the current Commander-in-Chief.  I have not relied upon the opinion of any news agency, pundit, or party hack.  You are just as capable of making yourself mindful of POTUS' actual statements, rather than his lackeys' spin, as am I.

President Trump has stated he possessed a plan to defeat ISIS quickly and effectively.  He has also declared he knows more about ISIS than his Generals.  Subsequently, he has directed those same Generals to provide him with a  Plan to Defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.  This is not my opinion.  His statements, memorandum, and executive orders are available for your perusal.

With regard to POTUS' espoused methodology allow me to comment.  When you propose to annihilate an opposing force (and their families) you have removed all basis for a negotiated or imposed peace.  The opposing force knows there will be no quarter and therefore will resist by all means available t them.  In the face of annihilation, friendly forces who come under the influence of the opposition, through capture or injury, have no reasonable claim nor expectation to merciful or humane treatment.  Hence, when you develop such a policy you not only provide a propaganda source to those with whom you are in conflict but you also expose your own forces to greater risk.

According to POTUS' comments he apparently believes the defeat of ISIS is possible by the almost exclusive use of air power.  I agree that in a military conflict the extensive use of air power to degrade the effectiveness of an opposing force and effect the imposition of a national will is an important, even essential, part of a strategy.  However, short of the extensive use of nuclear weapons, which raises another set of issues, there can be no victory solely through the use of  air power.  Here are some examples.  In February of 1945 the allies bombed Dresden, Germany for 3 days.  This resulted in a firestorm which engulfed central Dresden.  The population of Dresden at that time was approximately 350,000.  The generally accepted number of deaths as a result of this bombing action is 25,000.  In August of 1945 the U.S. bombed Hiroshima, Japan with the first nuclear weapon ever employed in combat.  At the time the population of Hiroshima was estimated at 381,000.  The number of deaths attributed to this strike over the first 2-4 months is 90,000-146,000.  In 1991 air power was used to great affect in Desert Storm.  However, is was immediately followed by ground campaign.  There are 2 points here.  The first is, bombing is never the sole means to victory.  The second is, annihilation is not a viable strategy.

On June 21st of this year the President  delegated to the Secretary of Defense the functions and authorities vested in the President by section 10005 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115-31) (the "Act").  This provides Secretary Mattis authorization to designate the purpose and expenditure of $2,476,200,000.  However, these funds will not be available until 15 days after the President provides the appropriate committees a report on the United States strategy for the defeat of the Islamic State of Iraq and al Sham.  Apparently, there is still no plan.

Donald J. Trump is the duly elected President of the United States, and therefore Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.  Would you willingly allow him to place in harms' way, based upon the above, your friends and family?

The below are direct quotes of POTUS.  The text highlighted in red are my comments/questions.

May 27, 2015 on Fox News:  Trump said, “I do know what to do and I would know how to bring ISIS to the table or, beyond that, defeat ISIS very quickly.”  He then added, “And I’m not gonna tell you what it is tonight.” Trump explained:  “I don’t want the enemy to know what I’m doing. Unfortunately, I’ll probably have to tell at some point, but there is a method of defeating them quickly and effectively and having total victory.”
What is total victory?  

July 8, 2015 July 8 interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper:   "I would do things that would be so tough that I don't even know if they'd be around to come to the table. … I would bomb the hell out of those oil fields [in Iraq]. I wouldn't send many troops, because you won't need them by the time I got finished."

Aug. 10, 2015 MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Aug. 10:   "I would knock the hell out of them, but I'd put a ring around it and I'd take the oil for our country."
Since, according to your statement on July 8, 2015 you will not send many troops, of what will this ring consist?

November 12, 2015:  Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump elaborated on his strategy to defeat the terrorist group ISIS.  He would go after ISIS-controlled oil fields and "bomb the s--- out of 'em,".  "I would bomb the s--- out of 'em. I would just bomb those suckers."

November 13, 2015 CNN Newsroom:  "I know more about ISIS than the Generals do.  Believe me."
This from a man who has never served a day in the military.  He has never "gone in harm's way".  He has never led troops into battle.  He has never attended the United States Army Command and General Staff College (CGSC).  

December 2, 2015 Fox and Friends:  “But we’re fighting a very politically correct war. And the other thing is, with the terrorists: You have to take out their families. When you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families. They care about their lives. Don’t kid yourself. But they say they don’t care about their lives. You have to take out their families.”
This is a tactic that would likely be considered a war crime.  The purposeful murder of civilians during wartime is widely considered a crime against humanity. Specifically, under the U.S.-signed Hague Conventions, the U.S. has agreed not to intentionally use violence against civilian non-combatants during wartime.

September 6, 2015 Greenville N.C. campaign stop:  “We are going to convey my top generals and give them a simple instruction,”  “They will have 30 days to submit to the Oval Office a plan for soundly and quickly defeating ISIS.
I'm not really clear on what happened to the secret plan or why he would request a plan from Generals who know less than him.

September 7, 2016 Commander in Chief Forum:  “When I do come up with a plan that I like and that perhaps agrees with mine, or maybe doesn’t, I may love what the generals come back with. I have a plan, but I don’t want to ― look, I have a very substantial chance of winning, make America great again. We’re going to make America great again. I have a substantial chance of winning. If I win, I don’t want to broadcast to the enemy exactly what my plan is. Let me tell you, if I like maybe a combination of my plan or the generals’ plan, if I like their plan, I’m not going to call you up and say, we have a great plan."
WTF, over.

September 19, 2016 Fox News:  “we have to get tough.”  "We're going to have to do something extremely tough over there".


Whaduyathink?