Thursday, June 1, 2017

Terra Damnatus or (Doomed Land)


The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Donald J. Trump spoke by telephone today with Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, President Emmanuel Macron of France, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada, and Prime Minister Theresa May of the United Kingdom. The President personally explained his decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Accord. He thanked all four leaders for holding frank, substantive discussions on this issue during his first months in office. He also reassured the leaders that America remains committed to the Transatlantic alliance and to robust efforts to protect the environment. He noted America’s strong record in reducing emissions(1) and leading the development of clean energy technology(2), and he reiterated that the United States under the Trump Administration, will be the cleanest and most environmentally friendly country on Earth(3). The leaders all agreed to continue dialogue and strengthen cooperation on environmental and other issues going forward.

Boldface and Notations (1), (2), and (3) added.

(1)World Resources Institute Apr. 5, 2016

The Roads to Decoupling: 21 Countries Are Reducing Carbon Emissions While Growing GDP

Change in CO2 emissions 2000-2014

Denmark -30%, Ukraine -29%, Hungary -24%, Portugal -23%, Romania -22%, Slovakia -22%, United Kingdom -20%, France -19%, Finland -18%, Ireland -16%, Czech Republic -14%, Spain -14%, Belgium -12%, Germany -12%, Switzerland -10%, Netherlands -8%, Sweden -8%, USA -6%, Bulgaria -5%, Austria -3, Uzbekistan -2%.  Ok, maybe we're not really leading the way in reducing emissions but at least we're in the top 19.

(2)cleantechnica.com Feb. 4, 2016.  ­

How 11 Countries Are Leading The Shift To Renewable Energy

Sweden, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Scotland, Germany, Uruguay, Denmark, China, Morocco, USA, Kenya.  Hey, at least we're ahead of Kenya. 

(3)No doubt a key to achieving this admirable goal is to begin by debilitating the EPA.  Here's what POTUS has suggested for FY2018. 

REDUCTION: CATEGORICAL GRANTS Environmental Protection Agency

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides categorical grants to help fund State environmental program offices and activities.  Many States have been delegated authority to implement and enforce Federal environmental laws including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Safe Drinking Water Act.  The Budget proposes to reduce many of these grants and eliminate others to better focus and prioritize environmental activities on core functions required by Federal environmental laws.

Funding Summary (In millions of dollars) -482

ELIMINATION: ENERGY STAR AND VOLUNTARY CLIMATE PROGRAMS Environmental Protection Agency

The Budget eliminates funding for Energy Star and several other voluntary partnership programs related to energy and climate change.  These programs are not essential to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) core mission and can be implemented by the private sector.

Funding Summary (In millions of dollars) -66

REDUCTION: ENFORCEMENT Environmental Protection Agency

The Budget proposes to reduce the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) environmental enforcement activities.  The reduction to EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance programs will allow the agency to re-focus enforcement priorities on programs that are not delegated to States and avoid duplication of effort in States with delegated enforcement authority.

Funding Summary (In millions of dollars) -129

ELIMINATION: GEOGRAPHIC PROGRAMS Environmental Protection Agency

Geographic Programs fund a variety of ecosystem protection activities within specific watersheds, including the Great Lakes, Chesapeake Bay, Puget Sound, and others.  These activities are primarily local efforts and the responsibility for coordinating and funding these efforts generally belongs with States and local partnerships.

Funding Summary (In millions of dollars) -427

REDUCTION: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Environmental Protection Agency

The Budget reconfigures and restructures the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) activities in research and development to focus on research objectives that support statutory requirements. Extramural Science to Achieve Results (STAR) grants will not receive funding.

Funding Summary (In millions of dollars) -234

REDUCTION: SUPERFUND Environmental Protection Agency

The Budget proposes to reduce funding for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Hazardous Substance Superfund Account, focusing on reining in Superfund administrative costs and promoting efficiencies.  The Budget proposes that EPA would optimize the use of existing settlement funds for sites where those funds exist and will look for ways to remove some of the barriers that have delayed the program's ability to return sites to the community.

Funding Summary (In millions of dollars) -330

No doubt this $1,668,000,00 will make a significant difference in the budget deficit and promote the creation of many, many jobs.  I find the reductions in enforcement and the Superfund to be particularly poignant.  Note the multiple references to the EPA's mission and core functions.  Here's the mission statement of the EPA, "The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Mission Statement: EPA's mission is to protect human health and to safeguard the natural environment air, water, and land upon which life depends."  I would think enforcing environmental regulations and being able to remediate sites where those regulations are violated would be pertinent to the performance of core functions.  Obviously we no longer need be concerned about  risks to our health or environment.  Things like Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant where the groundwater was contaminated with methylene chloride and trichloroethene. Perchlorate, lead, and mercury were also found on the site and in nearby streams are a thing of the past.  Oops, my bad, that one is an ongoing concern.

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
According to researchers from MIT, if every nation that signed the Paris Climate Accord met all of their commitments until the end of the century, the impact on the climate would be negligible.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology officials said U.S. President Donald Trump badly misunderstood their research when he cited it on Thursday to justify withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement. 

"How much of a difference will the Paris Agreement make?" showing that if countries abided by their pledges in the deal, global warming would slow by between 0.6 degree and 1.1 degrees Celsius by 2100. 

"If we don't do anything, we might shoot over 5 degrees or more and that would be catastrophic," said John Reilly, the co-director of the program, adding that MIT's scientists had had no contact with the White House and were not offered a chance to explain their work.

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
Therefore, in order to fulfill my solemn duty to protect America and its citizens, the United States will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord -- (applause) -- thank you, thank you -- but begin negotiations to reenter either the Paris Accord or a really entirely new transaction on terms that are fair to the United States, its businesses, its workers, its people, its taxpayers.  So we’re getting out.  But we will start to negotiate, and we will see if we can make a deal that’s fair.  And if we can, that’s great.  And if we can’t, that’s fine.

President Emmanuel Macron told U.S. President Donald Trump that the Paris climate deal could not be renegotiated and that while France would continue to work with Washington, it would no longer discuss climate issues with the United States, a French source said.

"The president spoke with President Trump in a five-minute phone call. The exchange was direct," a source close to Macron said.

"The president said that they could continue to talk, but indicated that nothing was renegotiable with regard to the Paris accords. The United States and France will continue to work together, but not on the subject of climate," the source added.

From <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-climatechange-france-idUSKBN18S6H3>

Well, so much for that idea.

Whaduyathink?

No comments:

Post a Comment